IMF paper questions ‘visceral opposition’ to inflow controls

Controls on capital inflows are guilty by association, paper argues

imf-hq
Although capital inflow controls have gained greater recognition in recent years, they are still viewed with "considerable suspicion", the authors say.

Controls on capital inflows evoke "visceral opposition", thanks in part to the perception of controls on outflows, a working paper published by the IMF contends.

In What's in a name? That which we call capital controls, Atish Ghosh and Mahvash Qureshi investigate why capital inflows have received a bad name, by tracing how they have been used and perceived since the nineteenth century.

The authors quote Bank of Mexico governor Agustin Carstens, attempting to answer a question on capital controls

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Central Banking? View our subscription options

Register for Central Banking

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Central Banking account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account

.