IMF paper questions ‘visceral opposition’ to inflow controls
Controls on capital inflows are guilty by association, paper argues
Controls on capital inflows evoke "visceral opposition", thanks in part to the perception of controls on outflows, a working paper published by the IMF contends.
In What's in a name? That which we call capital controls, Atish Ghosh and Mahvash Qureshi investigate why capital inflows have received a bad name, by tracing how they have been used and perceived since the nineteenth century.
The authors quote Bank of Mexico governor Agustin Carstens, attempting to answer a question on capital controls
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@centralbanking.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.centralbanking.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@centralbanking.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@centralbanking.com